Container Finished Housing Company
Among container finished housing companies, Suzhou Zhongnan Steel Structure Co., Ltd., CIMC Modular Building Investment Co., Ltd., Yazhi Integrated Housing Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Yufada Integrated Housing Co., Ltd. stand out. Here is a detailed analysis of these companies:
Suzhou Zhongnan Steel Structure Co., Ltd.: Its packing boxes adopt a full steel structure frame and perform excellently under extreme working conditions. The measured wind resistance level reaches Grade 12, the earthquake resistance level is Grade 8, and the frame deformation rate is only 0.18%, far below the industry's qualified threshold of 0.3%. In addition, its foldable containers have significant advantages in transportation and storage. After folding, they are small in size. A single truck can load 20 sets of products, and the storage space occupied is only 20% of the expanded state.
CIMC Modular Building Investment Co., Ltd.: As a world-leading supplier of logistics equipment and energy equipment, its standard container houses have a wind resistance level of Grade 11, an earthquake resistance level of Grade 7, and a deformation rate of 0.27%. In terms of foldable containers, the folded volume is one-fourth of the expanded state, and a single truck can load 16 sets, resulting in relatively low transportation and storage costs.
Yazhi Integrated Housing Co., Ltd.: Its quick-assembly boxes have a wind resistance level of Grade 10, an earthquake resistance level of Grade 7, and a deformation rate of 0.32%. For container mobile homes, the deformation is 5mm, which meets national standards. However, it is slightly inferior to the first two companies in terms of local node reinforcement. Its foldable containers have a folded volume that is one-fifth and a half of the expanded state, and a single truck can load 18 sets, offering certain cost advantages.
Tianjin Yufada Integrated Housing Co., Ltd.: Its ordinary container houses have a wind resistance level of Grade 9, an earthquake resistance level of Grade 6, and a deformation rate of 0.41%, showing relatively weak performance among the four companies.
