Scan Code to Enter Mobile Toilet
There are cases where scanning a code is required to enter mobile toilets.
I. Specific Cases
Mobile Toilet in Fuzhou, Fujian: A QR code is posted on the door of this mobile toilet, with instructions such as 'Scan the code to push open the door, and lock it from the inside after entering.' It also reminds users to 'check carefully if there is anyone inside, and if not, scan the code and push open the door immediately.' After scanning the code and paying the fee, the toilet starts a countdown. However, due to controversy, this practice has been temporarily suspended, and the price has been adjusted from the initial 10 yuan to 2 yuan.
Toilet at the New Commercial Landmark Feiyuelli: The door of this toilet is closed, and users need to first scan the code via WeChat or Alipay, register as members of the commercial complex, and then scan the generated QR code to open the door. This practice has also been questioned by citizens, who believe it creates inconvenience under the guise of convenience, especially for elderly people and those unfamiliar with mobile phones.
II. Impacts of Scanning Code to Enter Mobile Toilets
Convenience: For users familiar with mobile phone operations, scanning a code to enter a mobile toilet provides a novel and relatively convenient way to use the toilet. However, for those unfamiliar with mobile phone operations or without a mobile phone, this design brings great inconvenience and may even prevent them from using the toilet.
Privacy and Security: The design of scanning a code to enter a mobile toilet improves the privacy and security of the toilet to a certain extent, as only those who have scanned the code and paid or registered as members can enter. However, it also raises concerns about personal privacy leakage, as the scanning process may require providing personal information or authorizing access to certain data.
Social Reaction: The practice of scanning a code to enter mobile toilets has sparked widespread discussion and controversy in society. Some people believe it is an innovative attempt that helps improve the service level of public facilities, while others think it is too cumbersome and even infringes on the basic rights of users.
