Quay lại blog
Bài viết

Mobile Toilet Take-off

Quản trị 20 tháng 9, 2026

There are two different incidents of 'mobile toilet take-off', each with distinct causes and circumstances.

Baoding, Hebei Incident

In Baoding, Hebei, a rather comical incident of a 'mobile toilet take-off' occurred. A woman was using a mobile toilet on the roadside when, unaware of the external situation, she was lifted along with the toilet by a crane onto a truck. The truck then rushed onto the highway, initiating an unexpected 'highway toilet sightseeing tour'. The cause of the mobile toilet's 'take-off' in this incident was being lifted by the crane. As a heavy-duty mechanical device, cranes possess immense lifting capacity. During operation, if the personnel involved fail to coordinate and communicate effectively on-site, or if the woman inside the toilet does not hear external warnings, such an accident can occur. This 'take-off' does not imply that the mobile toilet itself has the ability to fly; rather, it was forcibly moved onto the highway by external force, causing great fright and inconvenience to the individual involved.

Street Incident in the United States

A 'mobile toilet take-off' also occurred on a street in the United States, but the cause was entirely different from that in Baoding, Hebei. Here, the public toilet was blown away by strong winds, soaring freely in the air and spilling its contents of liquid and solid waste, creating what is known as a 'golden rain'. The cause of the mobile toilet's 'take-off' in this incident was being affected by strong winds. When the wind reaches a certain intensity, due to its structural characteristics, the mobile toilet may have an unstable center of gravity and insufficiently secure connections to the ground, making it susceptible to being lifted by the wind. Moreover, the mobile toilet may contain liquid and solid waste inside, which can spill out during flight due to shaking and other factors.

Although both incidents are referred to as 'mobile toilet take-offs', they differ significantly in essence: one was caused by human operational errors, while the other was triggered by natural factors.